Showing posts with label newfoundland. Show all posts
Showing posts with label newfoundland. Show all posts

Sunday, April 05, 2015

Towards an Atlantic-wide deregulated electricity sector. The story of NL Power & NS Power

From 'The energy anti-trust handbook' via google books 





Event Proceedings



THE ATLANTICA POWER MARKET: A Plan for Joint Action GORDON L. WEIL The AIMS Atlantica Papers #1

Atlantica Ideas Matter 01 JM-Final 02


Event Proceedings


Atlantic Canada and the U.S. Electricity Market: Projects and Perspectives Gordon L. Weil Halifax, Nova Scotia October 2015 http://www.aims.ca/site/media/aims/ACUSelectric.pdf


Gas Opportunities for Atlantic Canada Andrew Pickford
http://www.atlanticaenergy.org/uploads/file/publications/Gas%20Opportunities%20for%20Atlantic%20Canada.pdf


N.S. review board opens up energy market competition March 25, 2016

http://thechronicleherald.ca/business/1351900-n.s.-review-board-opens-up-energy-market-competition

NAFTA and proportionality: A devil's bargain

| OCTOBER 6, 2015
http://rabble.ca/news/2015/10/nafta-and-proportionality-devils-bargain


Gas Opportunities for Atlantic Canada Andrew Pickford
http://www.atlanticaenergy.org/uploads/file/publications/Gas%20Opportunities%20for%20Atlantic%20Canada.pdf

For the next piece...Historical timeline of deregulation in modern NL, the players involved and where they were at specific points along the path towards deregulation of each specific sector. NL Power & NS Power. Connections of private interests to both main political parties. Offshore tax havens. More on price fixing and hamstringing regulators. Pipelines. Natural Gas. Water Markets...

Monday, February 03, 2014

The pipeline deal for 60 trillion cubic feet of natural gas offshore NL aka 'Muskrat Falls' #nlpoli #cdnpoli

The wet dream of NL Inc. for the past 15 years or so years has been to put in a natural gas export pipeline from the offshore oil & gas fields of eastern Newfoundland to points west. The natural gas pipeline system which extends up into Nova Scotia from the United States has been eyed greedily by both liberal & conservative governments in the past two decades, but no one has been able to make a deal happen for the gas offshore NL, to get the deal 'just right'. To fit all the pieces together and bring it home for private shareholders and institutional investors in not only canada's but the world's largest energy companies took alot of doing. It appears that it has potentially involved the trading off of public assets, those being not only the assets involved in the muskrats falls hydro electric dam and the related transmission infrastructure but indeed the people of NL's publicly owned utility NL Hydro.

The offshore gas fields in NL are reported to contain upwards of 60 Trillion cubic feet of natural gas, yes that's trillions with a T (http://newenergynl.ca/2011/06/21/20110621-2/ & http://www.northernlightsottawa.com/presentations/friday/PaulBarnes_CAPP_EDMS-202549-v1-Northern_Lights_presentation_February_2012.pdf).

Now, as a forester / farmer I don't pretend to know much about the technical aspects of the oil & gas sector but what I do know is it has the richest companies in the world operating within its folds, and those same companies are operating within my province on resources that are at least in part governed by the rules within our jurisdiction. With all that money comes influence and an ability to make things go your way. Complicit governments writing enabling legislation, so these massive corporations can operate outside the oversight of democratically elected legislative representatives is a major issue around the world. Here in NL recent legislation such as the energy corporation act of 2007 and its sections 5.4-5 are a big part of the problem, as is bill 29 and section 31 of its parent bill of 2002.

My research for the past decade has been focused on the issues around water privatization and hydro electric dams, and most recently has moved onto include the links those two issues have to hydraulic fracturing expansion in northeastern BC. I followed the water issue as a stand alone issue locally starting in 2003 through to the expropriation in 2009 of abitibi bowaters assets in central NL. There were concerns being raised at the time by a number of groups around the water rights granted by the harper administration under nafta where water rights appeared to be both granted and taken all in one swoop. Most of this kerfuffle is explained in the last post on this blog.

What I failed to recognize when I last posted was the issue of a gas pipeline system for the natural gas offshore NL, and the potential for massive profits off that resource. Once I saw that it didn't take long to find the studies left behind by the past liberal government for an offshore pipeline system and to begin to make the connections to the investors and executives piling up around the deal emera has with nalcor for the muskrat falls project to see there is way more to this deal than met the eye. Water is still a key piece but not for local NL players, they are just being used to set it up for the larger deal for Canadian water. Going on underneath is the deal with petronas in BC for the montney shale gas expansion and Montney Water Project, which is the real prize for the current crowd of corporate elite pulling our democracies strings.

What I've discovered appears to point to a rather large private investment in a pipeline expansion project by groups like exxon mobil, spectra energy, encana and snc-lavalin to get at the gas offshore NL under the guise of a hydro-electric & transmission deal built by the very people who appear to have been in the background helping put together the pipeline plan. Not all parties may be aware of all the workings inside the deal, but certainly some must know what is being sold, and what is being purchased as multi-billion dollar contracts are signed for the publicly administered natural resource wealth belonging to the good people of Newfoundland & Labrador.

The issue of water privatization is certainly in the background for local brokers when they eye the trillions of cubic feet of natural gas, but the initial profit from the gas resource is merely the driving force for the greed and underhandedness witnessed around the whole muskrat falls debacle. The real treasure is undoubtedly the water for those who have the security of billions in the bank and all the power one could imagine that wealth brings, for those amongst us who control the water control the fate of humanity. We only need look to the conflicts in the middle east and dig a little to find water issues being a major underlying factor in most of the disputes, though you will not find many people or reports discussing it...its simply too hot a topic.

My issue with what I see happening in NL around this pipeline deal is that Canadian water is being threatened with privatization. This threat is coming from the 'investor-state dispute settlement' mechanisms built into the new free trade deals being shoved down our throats, as well as the legislation which may have been abused under the guise of democratically elected government to help enable that privatization using greed and belief in 'the market' as both motivating factor and justification. Its not good enough.

If we are to progress as a species and continue forward together through the challenges we will face in the future whether that be a rapidly warming & volatile climate, ocean acidification, desertification, failing agriculture systems etc. we must go forward together, not separated by greed and fear.


More to come...but while you wait here are a couple links...

http://thechronicleherald.ca/business/1133470-pieridae-inks-35-billion-deal-for-gas-from-goldboro-lng

http://thechronicleherald.ca/business/1166323-lng-plan-would-use-pipeline

https://www.encana.com/news-stories/news-releases/details.html?release=615129

http://boereport.com/oil-and-gas-news-headlines/news/exxonmobil-announces-hebron-oil-project-to-proceed-off-canadas-east-coast/

http://www.theogm.com/2011/06/19/the-journey-to-hebron/

http://www.powerinourhands.ca/pdf/NaturalGas.pdf 

http://www.engr.mun.ca/~sbruneau/research/energy/SB2.pdf 

http://www.offshore-mag.com/articles/print/volume-61/issue-8/news/offshore-canada-newfoundland-solving-gas-transport-iceberg-management-challenges.html

Update April 7th, 2014

Husky Energy Inc eyes Atlantic Canada LNG project to export to Europe, Indonesia 

(http://business.financialpost.com/2014/04/03/husky-energy-inc-eyes-atlantic-canada-lng-project-to-export-to-europe-indonesia/?__lsa=9929-a3af)


Updated insight 01.21.2018 re: 'pipeline load'

Dams for Dilbit: How Canada’s New Hydro Dams Will Power Oil Pipelines

By James Wilt • Wednesday, January 10, 2018 - 11:50 https://www.desmog.ca/2018/01/10/dams-dilbit-how-canada-s-new-hydro-dams-will-power-oil-pipelines?

Update insight..10.10.2018 re: 'power from shore'
Equinor flips a switch on Johan Sverdrup
Norwegian Minister of Petroleum and Energy, Kjell-Børge Freiberg, on Tuesday officially opened the power-from-shore solution, which will provide the Johan Sverdrup field in the North Sea with electricity for more than 50 years. https://www.offshoreenergytoday.com/equinor-flips-a-switch-on-johan-sverdrup/

https://www.equinor.com/en/news/2018-10-09-johan-sverdrup-powered-shore.html

update insight...10.10.2019. https://www.imaginethepotential.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Presentation-2018-10-24-David-Campbell_public.pdf
NOIA now reporting 190+ trillion cubic feet of natural gas offshore.


updated from tweet -> https://twitter.com/Jim_M_Keating/status/1252254052525780992



Notes for next piece
Outside of the offshore gas is the gas onshore in NL, the private water rights that may be assumed by emera and perhaps even Kruger Energy for their Deer Lake Power dam on Junction Brook. The water behind that dam (Grand Lake) holds alot of water and the watershed includes a large portion of the surface area of western NL.

Nova Scotia gas export deals for $35 billion dollar contracts cannot be linked to private water as has been done in BC on williston lake. We cannot get out of $35 billion dollar contracts by paying out, remember Harper has stated it would be the responsibility of provinces in the future (via the abitibi settlement). There is substantial risk inside this deal and it needs complete review before any more contracts are signed.

Believe it or not there is also a plan for atlantic-wide electricity deregulation inside this whole big mess which will involve both NL Power (Fortis) & NS Power (Emera) that could have inside of it another layer of the offshore natural gas deal for gas distribution on the island. Interesting that Fortis has not showed itself up to this point in the 'Muskrat Falls' fiasco, though they are sitting on CH Hudson in New York where the HVDC line from Quebec plugs in. Its owned by Balckstone but was originally a douglas capital / TDI line when NALCOR signed on with with them in 2011. GDFSuezo bought ventus wind who have a tremendous amount of canadian wind under permit, but as yet unbuilt. Ventus were the original partners with the metis in labrador for a 5000W wind farm....oh so interesting. Riverbank power and pumped hydro is also very interesting and will be explored in future posts.

Thursday, April 12, 2012

The privatization of Canadian water is occurring right under our noses #cdnwater #nlpoli #bcpoli #cdnpoli

In the years leading up to Harper's majority the neo-con boys were busy. They were busy setting up contracts, trade deals, pipelines, transmission systems, water legislation, electorates & premierships.

This has occurred in the jurisdictions where water and electricity resources are available to export to the United States. Mainly NL, Que, BC & AB but that is not to say there hasn't been equal pressure put on other provinces resources and politicians.

In NL, the situation started with a Hydro deal in '98 which allowed the establishment of four private dams. The two dams of concern related to the Canadian water privatization threat are Star Lake and Rattle Brook. There was a public outcry and a halt was ordered to the establishment of private hydro facilities, but the two facilities had already been put in place.  http://www.releases.gov.nl.ca/releases/1998/exec/0831n01.htm

Between '01 & '03 legislation around these two dams was altered, and in between the water act was created replacing a host of outdated legislation. The wording in the new legislation refers to water right & licences as opposed to water leases & permits and this is where the process towards privatizing water, begun in '98 and continued under Danny Williams' administration really starts to accelerate. A similar process of privatization is currently being repeated in the proposed BC water act thanks perhaps to our 'enabling legislation' and the precedent setting case involving Harper and the Abitibi expropriation under NAFTA. In BC, Gwyn Morgan and the Christie Clarke Liberal government are working hard for their corporate friends in regard to water privatization, and what a prize that'll be for the corporate sector if it all goes through.  http://www.watershedsentinel.ca/content/ge-and-privatization-water

The Star Lake facility was expropriated in '09 along with the rest of ABH's assets on the Island by the Williams administration. Around that time EMERA first bought into Algonquin Utilities, which not coincidentally runs the Rattle Brook run of river hydro facility. Local concern went to the people impacted as well as the issues of contamination around the millsite but few picked up on the water issues it raised, except a lawyer representing the Council of Canadians.

Shortly after Williams expropriation of Abitibi (ABH)'s assets on the Island Harper paid out $130 million to ABH for Williams actions and effectively granted private water rights to ABH on the Star Lake facility according to the Council. Up to that point there had only been a permit/lease arrangement, but with newly amended legislation and the NAFTA ruling referring to water 'rights', the Rattle Brook facility may be considered 'private' with a licence and 'water rights' associated with it.

Williams signed the EMERA term sheet a few days before stepping down on Dec. 3, 2010. On Dec. 17 (two weeks to the day after his resignation came into effect) there was a large purchase of shares in EMERA (7.5 million with a value around 1/4 billion), and EMERA bought again into Algonquin. EMERA also received the go ahead on the purchase of Maine & Maritime Corporation (MAM) on the 16th which could have also contributed to the triggering of the large and rather anomalous share purchase http://www.emera.com/en/home/mediacentre/recentnews/2010/newsreleasedetails.aspx?SourceParams=reqid-1508712

The question all this raises....Is EMERA setting up in NL to establish a private water market in preparation for CETA? If the goings on in BC & AB are reflective of what is going on here in NL then the question needs to be asked now rather than later, before the deals are signed and sealed.

So, with the EMERA term sheet set to be signed shortly, is the future of Canadian water hanging in limbo? Lets hope not.

UPDATED
The latest development occurred just a couple days ago on April 10th, 2012 EMERA bought further into Algonquin on the verge of the term sheet being finalized.

AND AGAIN on July 31st 2012 they buy more into Algonquin -> Emera - News Release Details Emera Increases Investment in Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp.. This is a key day as it is also the day Emera finalized the deal with NALCOR for the whole deal on the Maritime & Labrador-Island link / Muskrat Falls fiasco Emera Inc. and Nalcor Energy Finalize Agreements for the Development of Muskrat Falls

NO surprise by now but they again bought into Algonquin on Oct. 7th 2014. they just won't stop!!

The Maritimes & Northeast Pipeline Ownership:
  • U.S.: LP Enbridge (U.S. Inc). (77.53%); Emera Inc. (12.92%); ExxonMobil Corporation (9.55%)
  • Canada: Enbridge Inc. (77.53%); Emera Inc. (12.92%); ExxonMobil Corporation (9.55%)


Additional reading

http://www.algonquinpower.com/financial/reports/annrep99.pdf 10640 NL Ltd was registered in NL & shifted to NS. why is #'d company investing in a dam w ties to water privatization? Dec '98 ALQ acquired via 100% of outstanding shares of 10640 Newfoundland Ltd





Monday, January 10, 2011

Brad Cabana has got a pair

Well.

At least we know someone has a pair.

Might be THE game-changer we need around here. Hope so.

No local political ties, from out west with NL roots.

What will come from this? Stay tuned.

Wednesday, February 24, 2010

Canada's newest Community Forest is on the Eastport Peninsula

This report Community Forest Network: A Consultation on the Eastport Peninsula is the result of many hours of work and dedication by too many people to mention individually. Obviously the efforts of the Model Forest and the Department of Natural Resources need to be recognized, as do the efforts of the report writers and dedicated individuals who took time out of their schedules to participate in the overall effort. That being said...where does it leave us now?

Although there were many 'somewhat unexpected' bumps and curves along the way, this report has made it into the hands of the people who originally petitioned the government for the halt to logging without fair and informed citizen input in and around their community. From here it will disperse to as many people as possible for review before our next community meeting which will hopefully be more open and informative than the initial 'circus' we saw from ill-equipped representatives of the Department of Natural Resources.

More to come in the following weeks...

Friday, February 19, 2010

Political fandangling. Newfoundland bureaucrat style...

So this is what we've been waiting for...Feasability study for the establishment of a Community Forest on the Eastport Peninsula.

Too bad it had to come via the usual channels, those being third parties a year or two late.

SO!!  Be that as it may, here we go!!


Welcome to the 21st century of forest management in Newfoundland and Labrador gentlemen. Step inside my office and have a seat on the floor, that's the forest floor for all you pseudo foresters who have sat in offices your whole life pretending to be real foresters.

This should be a fun lesson in land use & forest management for all!!

Saturday, December 19, 2009

Winter time along the coast, but all is not well in the forests.

As winter sets in...the woods and bogs surrounding the outports come alive with human activity. With all the bogs and small rivers running through our back-country frozen for 5 months a year, it's the wintertime that people look forward to for their yearly wood harvesting, cabin-going, and snowmobile riding (our version of getting away from it all).

But there are other things going on out over the bog these days....

There are forestry roads still heading into some of our prime tourist areas, and there are local wanna-be forestry moguls using large machinery to make themselves a few bucks from the waste the large forestry companies are leaving behind. The results of this pillage will be a denuded landscape which is unable to support the local communities that have come to depend on them. Here's a plan by Corner Brook's Kruger to harvest a valley leading into Gros Morne National Park. Who thinks this is a good idea, besides the idiots who dreamed it up? Gros Morne's southern boundary is on the top of the image. You'll see this clearcutting when you head down over the hill towards the Jackladder. It's the first valley you see heading North (where the mountains come into view) and where lots of pictures now get taken.



Time to dump the dinosaurs people.

Saturday, November 08, 2008

What does the rejection of the amended AbitibiBowater deal amount to? Far more than meets the eye.



Above is the tenure breakdown on 2/3's of our Islands forest resource. 1/3 Abitibi Bowater, 1/3 Kruger, and what's left (not shown) is Crown controlled. The brown section is the Chartered land around Red Indian Lake which AB has a 999yr lease on! WHOA EH??!! Who signed that deal?

With the union members at the mill in GFW recently rejecting the amended 'secret' offer to 'restructure' the operation, the rest of us are left wondering...What are they not telling us? Why so secretive? Who's going to benefit off our backs this time? Where are they gonna dump the body (the new 'best deal' they're gonna release to the rest of us one day shortly)?

There are a few key points which aren't being discussed in the mainstream media. The most obvious being the hydro rights associated with their milling operations. Now, there are other issues associated with that hydro power that make it even more of a hot topic amongst those studying the issue of industrial water users on this side of the border, and I may get time to go into those, but for now we'll deal with AbitibiBowater and their current negotiation with our government and the national unions representing the mill employees.

Some of the key points missing from the media debate, which first focused on the 170 jobs and has since moved onto the 1100 jobs that are actually at stake along with the towns only economic engine, are;

1) 999 year lease on District 12, or Red Indian Lake (known as chartered land).
2) Star Lake Hydro (issue includes NAFTA and private power companies owning hydro facilities).
3) NAFTA chapters 6 & 12 coming into play when the power corridor gets put in from Labrador (NL Hydro, Fortis, NL Power, Churchill Falls / Lower Chirchill Development, NL's new power corporation etc. all are part of this picture).
4) Bill 27 (http://www.assembly.nl.ca/business/bills/Bill0227.htm) and its clause whcih forces the company onto an open public debate on their 100 year timber lease over 1/3 of Newfoundland's forest.
5) Where has this company been investing its money? Directly into their power facilites, not into their mill! That should be 'the tell' for everybody on this!
6) The demand for clean water and clean energy in the US. Where are the closest undeveloped resources that can feed this real and increasing demand? Who is in control of their development?
7) Think about the link between security corridors (ie Atlantica), hydro energy, and freshwater.

So...what we need to do is become informed, and demand that our politicians inform us of what really is at stake here.

To talk about 170 jobs alone should be considered a criminal act, and not be tolerated in todays world.

Wednesday, August 08, 2007

The Western Newfoundland Model Forest Comes to the East Coast

As a result of our communities commitment to stopping clearcutting in and around the local area by; publicly lobbying government through radio call-in shows, writing letters to the local newspapers / provincial government reps, and some creative legal fandanglinging on the part of a local community activist, we have been approached by the Western Newfoundland Model Forest (WNMF) as a potential Forest Community Network site for their 2007-2012 program.

From the WNMF proposal;

"Introduction: This initiative is designed to identify a Forest Community Network (FCN) site in cooperation with the Forestry Services Branch on the east coast of insular Newfoundland.

Background: In it's 2007-2012 proposal the WNMF identified four FCN's. A fifth site was discussed pending the availability of funds. Time did not allow us to define this site location other than to say it would be on the east coast of central Newfoundland.

In cooperation with the Forestry Services Branch, the WNMF staff are exploring the possibility of creating a FCN site (a network of small rural communities) near Terra Nova National Park.

Key Attributes: This yet to be named site would include a number of wholistic attributes that have come to define the WNMF program and our 2007-2012 proposal:
- Made up of a number of small rural communities referred to as a Forest Community Network (FCN),
- Strong buy-in and cooperation by community leaders acting as representatives of their communities,
- Local sustainable development, sustainable forest management and integrated resource management underpinning concepts,
- Explore a stronger link to values associated with coastal zone management,
- Buy-in by provincial departments of government and their regional/local staff,
- Proactive conflict avoidance/conflict resolution,
- Activities (projects) would have champions or active local chairs and working groups,
- Key values: water quality, aesthetics, tourism, wildlife, domestic cutting, agriculture, etc., and
- Linked to provincial, national and global network."

Now that's a mouthful, but overall a good way to start our little process here on the Eastport Peninsula. Lot's of openings in it to get people and groups involved on all sorts of levels.

By going this route the NL government has acknowledged there is a need for this type of community development in the province, and is willing to see what can come from our little group of concerned citizens with facilitation between 'us and them' provided by the WNMF.

From the way I'm looking at this there's a few reasons why government handed over the cash to the WNMF to come out and assess the situation here. First of all to pacify us and keep the waters calm, second to not be seen as totally giving us our way so that all the communities along the coast will want the same thing, and three to actually see if this is for real and not just a small group of loudmouths spewing off in the local and provincial media.


A little background on what has happened so far this year...

The local forest bureaucrats messed the process up back a couple of months ago by arranging a local meeting, intentionally not informing anybody on our committee of the date until two days before, and then showing up to the meeting here in Eastport with their sawmillers, harvesting contractors etc (who never opened their mouths at the meeting) to tell the people that it was better to let them harvest it than to let it burn. That scenario, once exposed, only convinced the local skeptics that government was going at this underhandedly, and ended up adding power to our cause. Oh, and by the way, two of the committee members phones went out the day they actually announced the meeting, and one of the phone lines had to be serviced by a regional phone guy from Gander it was so @#$%ed up. Quite the coincidence, no? and there's more...

After the meeting, and I'm guessing now, there was some 'discussion' amongst provincial bureaucrats about what to do with us. They settled on the Model Forest as a solution, since their old-school undemocratic tactics seemed to completely backfire, and it seems to have been a good move. We're happy and they're happy because we can get off their backs (for the time being anyway). Now, let's hope everything goes smoothly from here on in.

There's a provincial election coming up, a major review of the forest industry due out any day, as well as a 100 year tenure review on 1/3 of the provinces timber resource with hydro rights tied to it (Two BIG Montreal Pulp Companies are trying to muscle their way into the next level of resource development on our little Island paradise). Water rights is what they're really after (the pulp has been secondary for some time), and no one provincially wants to talk about it. Note: NL sits on a huge reservoir of fresh water that is feeding the pulp mills energy needs, and wouldn't they just love to sell that wholesale to the Americans later on?!

Now back to our story about the forests...The morning after the WNMF reps came down for their assessment of our 'committee and community leader buy-in', the area that is now proposed for cutting actually caught on fire and the water bombers had to be brought in! Another coincidence? Apparently a couple of kids had been smoking in the area the night before...

And that's where we are now. Waiting for a letter of commitment from the provincial forestry department acknowledging our communities concerns and taking the five year plans off the table for the time being.

More to follow as the saga of one communities fight to regain control over its resources continues to unfold.

Thursday, November 23, 2006

So you want pictures eh?


On a recent trip to Content Reach I took a few snaps of what is going on up there in the way of forestry operations. It appears that the government forestry department has decided to allow the road building to start without permits. The roads depicted in these photos are not set to be permitted until January 2007, but here they are in the fall of 2006. What gives?

There were also a few skidders (timber jacks) out around so I decided to take a few snaps of them. Notice the balding tires? That's why the soil is so torn up in this area.

I also took a few shots of an area that has been logged already to compare it to the area that has yet to be upturned by man. You can see the tracks through the bog area in the first photo, what will the second photo look like once they're done?



Not to be unfair, there are some nicer looking logged over areas out there, but I was not out there to showcase the forest industries good side. This is for the people of the NE Coast of Newfoundland to ponder. Is this what we want our forests to look like?


Friday, November 03, 2006

The last of Newfoundlands coastal black spruce forests are disappearing under a dying industries footprint

Newfoundlands last old-growth forests are under attack by a dying industrial forest industry.

Now, a statement like that seems extreme to some of you who mightened ever have consider yourself 'a green', but there is more to this than you might think...

A massive amount of the the Northeast Coast of Newfoundland is scheduled to be clearcut harvested over the next five years, particularly around the Eastport Peninsula and the Pt. Lemington area.

The Pt. Lemington harvest appears to be very problematic for the communities in and around the cutting in terms of future domestic firewood supply.

These maps are a result of the current round of forest districts 4, 5, 6 & 8 five year planning team meetings that have been taking place in Gander over the past year. This is the only planning process on the Island that is mandated to take into account public input on the land use surrounding communities. While the forestry department is mandated to take the publics input surrounding these plans, they do not have the fiscal ability, nor the mandate to facilitate all the uses outside of forestry that exist on our land base.

Through planning like this, the current government is ignoring the basic needs of well-established, sustainable human communities existing in the bays and inlets that have predominated the landscape of this serene coastline for centuries.

There are other, longer-term plans that are potentially even more destructive than what you see above. The 25 year harvest plans that the forestry department is working with are fantastical, and upon close inspection show an even darker future for our forest industry than we are led to believe.